<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Electronic Sprocket</title>
	<link>http://ElectronicSprocket.com</link>
	<description>my ramblings about new media</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 03:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on I&#8217;ve moved my blog by Paula</title>
		<link>http://ElectronicSprocket.com/2008/03/03/ive-moved-my-blog/#comment-2156</link>
		<author>Paula</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 02:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ElectronicSprocket.com/2008/03/03/ive-moved-my-blog/#comment-2156</guid>
					<description>How long have you been blogging...your good at it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How long have you been blogging&#8230;your good at it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I&#8217;ve moved my blog by goffylouds</title>
		<link>http://ElectronicSprocket.com/2008/03/03/ive-moved-my-blog/#comment-1801</link>
		<author>goffylouds</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 18:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ElectronicSprocket.com/2008/03/03/ive-moved-my-blog/#comment-1801</guid>
					<description>well, just aswell  &lt;a href="http://creative-think-tank.blogspot.com/2009/07/cheap-mobiles-uk.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;cheap mobiles uk&lt;/a&gt; stock really cheap electronics products. Make me looking foward to xmas already :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, just aswell  <a href="http://creative-think-tank.blogspot.com/2009/07/cheap-mobiles-uk.html" rel="nofollow">cheap mobiles uk</a> stock really cheap electronics products. Make me looking foward to xmas already <img src='http://electronicsprocket.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I&#8217;ve moved my blog by ES</title>
		<link>http://ElectronicSprocket.com/2008/03/03/ive-moved-my-blog/#comment-75</link>
		<author>ES</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 12:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ElectronicSprocket.com/2008/03/03/ive-moved-my-blog/#comment-75</guid>
					<description>Electronic Sprocket was originally supposed to be the name of our new new-media company and the blog was supposed to expand into the company site.  At the last minute we decided to go with Brave New Rocket as the company name so Electronic Sprocket became a brand without a purpose.

I also made a decision 6 months ago to start using my real name everywhere I post professionally so people would know who they were talking to.  I also wouldn't have to keep track of which alias I was using on which sites.

Oh, and another thing, Electronic Sprocket is more than 15 characters and that's over the limit of some websites for a login.  (That's right, I'm talking about YOU dee eye double gee dot com!)  So now all my personal and professional stuff can be consolidated over at EricSusch.com.  It keeps it all simple.  And maybe I'll get some love from Google too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Electronic Sprocket was originally supposed to be the name of our new new-media company and the blog was supposed to expand into the company site.  At the last minute we decided to go with Brave New Rocket as the company name so Electronic Sprocket became a brand without a purpose.</p>
<p>I also made a decision 6 months ago to start using my real name everywhere I post professionally so people would know who they were talking to.  I also wouldn&#8217;t have to keep track of which alias I was using on which sites.</p>
<p>Oh, and another thing, Electronic Sprocket is more than 15 characters and that&#8217;s over the limit of some websites for a login.  (That&#8217;s right, I&#8217;m talking about YOU dee eye double gee dot com!)  So now all my personal and professional stuff can be consolidated over at EricSusch.com.  It keeps it all simple.  And maybe I&#8217;ll get some love from Google too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I&#8217;ve moved my blog by Nick</title>
		<link>http://ElectronicSprocket.com/2008/03/03/ive-moved-my-blog/#comment-74</link>
		<author>Nick</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 02:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ElectronicSprocket.com/2008/03/03/ive-moved-my-blog/#comment-74</guid>
					<description>Why the change?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why the change?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Quarterlife by ES</title>
		<link>http://ElectronicSprocket.com/2007/12/06/quarterlife/#comment-73</link>
		<author>ES</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 18:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ElectronicSprocket.com/2007/12/06/quarterlife/#comment-73</guid>
					<description>Marshall,

Thanks for responding.  At least there’s someone reading my blog ;-) I’ve since watched all the rest of the episodes now available and I think I’m warming up to the series more.  Knowing that the episodes are really supposed to be an hour helps a lot.  You should make that clear on the web site.

My response to your response:

Call me crazy but I think that if Apple is giving you free computers in exchange for putting them in your show, that’s a product placement deal.  In any case you don’t have to shoot your lead actress from behind to avoid the logo.  You could simply give her a computer that doesn’t have an overbearing lit up logo on it in the first place.  That way you don’t have the issue at all for the rest of the series.  You don’t even have to bother with logo releases.  More viewer attention on the drama, less time doing paperwork.

The second “product placement” I was referring to was specifically the Scion logo in the car dealership.  (Yea, I know they’re owned by Toyota.)  The point is that Scion’s are specifically marketed to young people.  In episode one Jed says, “You got all these cars here that people under 30 should be buying,” just as it cuts to a wide shot with a surprisingly readable Scion logo looming over their heads.  It almost looks like the logo was added in post.  It’s not realistic against the bright windows at all.  Anyway, if you didn’t get paid for that then you got ripped off and some guy over on Madison Avenue is really celebrating big time because he just scored a major coup and probably a big promotion.

In any case, enough about the never-ending distraction of product placement.

I think not having an RSS feed and not being in iTunes is the biggest issue I’ve brought up that you need to consider.  I’m guessing that the deal with MySpace might be the problem there.  If not you should start a feed immediately and allow people to subscribe.  It’s the best way to deliver the show.  It allows the viewers to decide where and when they watch it.  If you always have to go to a particular web page you’ll inevitably loose viewers along the way because they’ll forget or sometimes they won’t feel like watching the show at their computer.  Consider:  My wife hasn’t seen the show and now she wants to.  So what do we do.  We can’t download the show to our AppleTV in the living room.  Will we sit together in my office and watch it on the computer in a little window?  Probably not.  Should I just tell her to go watch it by herself at her computer and we’ll talk about it later?  That probably won’t happen either and even if she did watch it all, what kind of entertainment is that when we can’t share it together?  If you want the big audience, then you need to deliver your content everywhere simultaneously so the audience can have the freedom to enjoy it the way they like.  

I think you are in a position to do some really pioneering work with this show and bring quality drama to the new media space.  One of the things we’re trying to do with our little knitting show (at www.LetsKnit2gether.com) is prove that new media doesn’t have to be crappy looking home video of dogs riding a bicycle.  It can stand toe to toe with broadcast television.  Hopefully your corporate deals with MySpace and such won’t hamstring your show too much before you can adjust to market forces and make a success of it.  Good luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marshall,</p>
<p>Thanks for responding.  At least there’s someone reading my blog <img src='http://electronicsprocket.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> I’ve since watched all the rest of the episodes now available and I think I’m warming up to the series more.  Knowing that the episodes are really supposed to be an hour helps a lot.  You should make that clear on the web site.</p>
<p>My response to your response:</p>
<p>Call me crazy but I think that if Apple is giving you free computers in exchange for putting them in your show, that’s a product placement deal.  In any case you don’t have to shoot your lead actress from behind to avoid the logo.  You could simply give her a computer that doesn’t have an overbearing lit up logo on it in the first place.  That way you don’t have the issue at all for the rest of the series.  You don’t even have to bother with logo releases.  More viewer attention on the drama, less time doing paperwork.</p>
<p>The second “product placement” I was referring to was specifically the Scion logo in the car dealership.  (Yea, I know they’re owned by Toyota.)  The point is that Scion’s are specifically marketed to young people.  In episode one Jed says, “You got all these cars here that people under 30 should be buying,” just as it cuts to a wide shot with a surprisingly readable Scion logo looming over their heads.  It almost looks like the logo was added in post.  It’s not realistic against the bright windows at all.  Anyway, if you didn’t get paid for that then you got ripped off and some guy over on Madison Avenue is really celebrating big time because he just scored a major coup and probably a big promotion.</p>
<p>In any case, enough about the never-ending distraction of product placement.</p>
<p>I think not having an RSS feed and not being in iTunes is the biggest issue I’ve brought up that you need to consider.  I’m guessing that the deal with MySpace might be the problem there.  If not you should start a feed immediately and allow people to subscribe.  It’s the best way to deliver the show.  It allows the viewers to decide where and when they watch it.  If you always have to go to a particular web page you’ll inevitably loose viewers along the way because they’ll forget or sometimes they won’t feel like watching the show at their computer.  Consider:  My wife hasn’t seen the show and now she wants to.  So what do we do.  We can’t download the show to our AppleTV in the living room.  Will we sit together in my office and watch it on the computer in a little window?  Probably not.  Should I just tell her to go watch it by herself at her computer and we’ll talk about it later?  That probably won’t happen either and even if she did watch it all, what kind of entertainment is that when we can’t share it together?  If you want the big audience, then you need to deliver your content everywhere simultaneously so the audience can have the freedom to enjoy it the way they like.  </p>
<p>I think you are in a position to do some really pioneering work with this show and bring quality drama to the new media space.  One of the things we’re trying to do with our little knitting show (at <a href="http://www.LetsKnit2gether.com" rel="nofollow">www.LetsKnit2gether.com</a>) is prove that new media doesn’t have to be crappy looking home video of dogs riding a bicycle.  It can stand toe to toe with broadcast television.  Hopefully your corporate deals with MySpace and such won’t hamstring your show too much before you can adjust to market forces and make a success of it.  Good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Quarterlife by milowent</title>
		<link>http://ElectronicSprocket.com/2007/12/06/quarterlife/#comment-72</link>
		<author>milowent</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 21:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ElectronicSprocket.com/2007/12/06/quarterlife/#comment-72</guid>
					<description>mr. e-sprocket:  i read the new tee vee article too. while his stats seem accurate, its not fair to see the audience is disappearing.  its way too early to say that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mr. e-sprocket:  i read the new tee vee article too. while his stats seem accurate, its not fair to see the audience is disappearing.  its way too early to say that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Quarterlife by Marshall Herskovitz</title>
		<link>http://ElectronicSprocket.com/2007/12/06/quarterlife/#comment-71</link>
		<author>Marshall Herskovitz</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 16:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ElectronicSprocket.com/2007/12/06/quarterlife/#comment-71</guid>
					<description>Eric--
Stick with the show!  The two "product placements" you mentioned weren't even product placements.  We had no deal with Apple or Toyota when we shot the pilot, and still have no deal with Apple.  They just let us use their equipment -- and we used non-Apple equipment as well.  Sorry that logo is in your face when she rolls around on the bed, but it would have been impossible to avoid except by shooting behind her head!  And Toyota had only given us permission to use their cars -- that was a real dealership and we had to pay to shoot there just like anybody else.

But your other point is more important.  You're right, it is impossible to do a dramatic show in eight minutes, and we're not trying to.  These episodes aggregate together into one hour stories.  You don't get the full emotional impact until then.  We considered all sorts of ways of presenting the show, and are still considering different ways, but this particular way -- eight minute episodes twice a week -- was decided on by Myspace, and tney're refusing to let us change it.  So for the moment that's how it has to be, but when our Myspace deal is over we'll be able to try a better template.

Thanks for giving us a chance.
Marshall</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric&#8211;<br />
Stick with the show!  The two &#8220;product placements&#8221; you mentioned weren&#8217;t even product placements.  We had no deal with Apple or Toyota when we shot the pilot, and still have no deal with Apple.  They just let us use their equipment &#8212; and we used non-Apple equipment as well.  Sorry that logo is in your face when she rolls around on the bed, but it would have been impossible to avoid except by shooting behind her head!  And Toyota had only given us permission to use their cars &#8212; that was a real dealership and we had to pay to shoot there just like anybody else.</p>
<p>But your other point is more important.  You&#8217;re right, it is impossible to do a dramatic show in eight minutes, and we&#8217;re not trying to.  These episodes aggregate together into one hour stories.  You don&#8217;t get the full emotional impact until then.  We considered all sorts of ways of presenting the show, and are still considering different ways, but this particular way &#8212; eight minute episodes twice a week &#8212; was decided on by Myspace, and tney&#8217;re refusing to let us change it.  So for the moment that&#8217;s how it has to be, but when our Myspace deal is over we&#8217;ll be able to try a better template.</p>
<p>Thanks for giving us a chance.<br />
Marshall</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Two and a half minutes with Steve Garfield by steve garfield</title>
		<link>http://ElectronicSprocket.com/2007/11/01/two-and-a-half-minutes-with-steve-garfield/#comment-69</link>
		<author>steve garfield</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 06:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ElectronicSprocket.com/2007/11/01/two-and-a-half-minutes-with-steve-garfield/#comment-69</guid>
					<description>Thanks!

It was fun1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks!</p>
<p>It was fun1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on when it’s out there, it’s out there by Nick</title>
		<link>http://ElectronicSprocket.com/2007/05/30/when-it%e2%80%99s-out-there-it%e2%80%99s-out-there/#comment-5</link>
		<author>Nick</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 17:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ElectronicSprocket.com/2007/05/30/when-it%e2%80%99s-out-there-it%e2%80%99s-out-there/#comment-5</guid>
					<description>Don't forget the role that Google and others play in this. It doesn't matter if it's "out there", if no one can find it. And the fact that Google and others keep copies of websites means the information can never be covered up, it's part of the human consciousness forever! (even the guy caught taking a leak on Google Street View)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget the role that Google and others play in this. It doesn&#8217;t matter if it&#8217;s &#8220;out there&#8221;, if no one can find it. And the fact that Google and others keep copies of websites means the information can never be covered up, it&#8217;s part of the human consciousness forever! (even the guy caught taking a leak on Google Street View)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The one that got away by Trish Andersen</title>
		<link>http://ElectronicSprocket.com/2007/04/27/the-one-that-got-away/#comment-3</link>
		<author>Trish Andersen</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 18:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ElectronicSprocket.com/2007/04/27/the-one-that-got-away/#comment-3</guid>
					<description>Wow! What you managed to get was great! My favorite was the stills of her talking, when you have lemons.....
Ewe havea great eye keep up the blog! Trish</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! What you managed to get was great! My favorite was the stills of her talking, when you have lemons&#8230;..<br />
Ewe havea great eye keep up the blog! Trish</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

